Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Toshiba Satellite Pro A300D (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Satellite Pro A300D
Memory	1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080519
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 21 '20 at 17:32
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core TK-57 456 User benchmarks, average bench 30% Socket M2/S1G1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	29% Poor	Memory 48.7 1-Core 27.4 2-Core 56.1 29% 44.1 Pts	4-Core 55.3 8-Core 55.9 7% 55.6 Pts	64-Core 54.7 3% 54.7 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HTS542512K9SA00 120GB-$25 1,782 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 98GB free (System drive) Firmware: BB2OC33P SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 52 50 50 51 42 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	29% Poor	Read 51.6 Write 42.3 Mixed 31.1 SusWrite 49.4 32% 43.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 31%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 64GB-$7 7,617 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 2GB free, PID 5591 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	11.6% Very poor	Read 23.9 Write 16.8 Mixed 17.6 SusWrite 14.8 24% 18.3 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 1.6 114% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 11.6% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	15% Very poor	MC Read 6 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 4.9 14% 4.9 GB/s	SC Read 4.5 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 4 13% 4.43 GB/s	Latency 165 24% 165 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16