Asus P8H67-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive21.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110510
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateApr 21 '20 at 02:19
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$194
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 89.8
1-Core 90.5
2-Core 164
69% 115 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 414
44% 350 Pts
64-Core 405
25% 405 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
MSI(1462 3607) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2810 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 151
Parallax 125
103% 134 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 173
Splatting 121
111% 137 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 104%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 67 71 70 23 30 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.9% Poor
Read 140
Write 92.2
Mixed 78.5
SusWrite 55.3
20% 91.6 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 17.7
4K Mixed 9.8
41% 13.3 MB/s
DQ Read 9.7
DQ Write 15.4
DQ Mixed 12.1
9% 12.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
81GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 72 72 73 24 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 80
Write 67.2
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 57.5
49% 65.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
162% 1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 68%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
385GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 89 80 95 87 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 142
Write 96.2
Mixed 40.7
SusWrite 90.9
67% 92.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
86% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 Kingston 99U5403-034.A00LF CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 Kingston 99U5403-034.A00LF 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.4% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 14.8
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 15.1
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 951 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $222
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback