Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium T4200-$99 5,474 User benchmarks, average bench 34% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	26.7% Poor	Memory 48 1-Core 18.1 2-Core 33.6 24% 33.2 Pts	4-Core 33.6 8-Core 34.8 5% 34.2 Pts	64-Core 26.3 2% 26.3 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce G105M 2,411 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 0205) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.74 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	0.68% Terrible	Lighting 0.7 Reflection 1.38 Parallax 0.28 1% 0.79 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 0.96 1% 1.12 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.68% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$32 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 15 12 13 9.8 12 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	52.7% Above average	Read 418 Write 11 Mixed 23.5 SusWrite 11.9 24% 116 MB/s	4K Read 84.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 2.7 132% 29.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM 15h Reserved Relative performance (0^th percentile)	5.14% Terrible	MC Read 1.3 MC Write 1.9 MC Mixed 1 4% 1.4 GB/s	SC Read 0.4 SC Write 0.6 SC Mixed 0.3 1% 0.43 GB/s	Latency 168 24% 168 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 5.14% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium T4300IntelBench 34%, 6,462 samples	34x
Core2 Duo T6600IntelBench 35%, 8,673 samples	29x
Pentium T4400Intel $110Bench 34%, 7,903 samples	28x

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 4500ATIBench 1%, 9,615 samples	84x
GeForce G105MNvidiaBench 1%, 2,411 samples	38x
Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset FamilyIntelBench 0%, 23,924 samples	30x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
JD240 240GBJamesdonkeyBench 55%, 1,127 samples	4x
870 Evo 250GBSamsung $31Bench 101%, 14,082 samples	4x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16