Lenovo 90JY0069MW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive153% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 90JY0069MW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3709
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1798 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 20 '20 at 12:35
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 93%

 PC Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$170
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
55.3% Above average
Memory 67.3
1-Core 61.8
2-Core 134
53% 87.6 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 266
35% 257 Pts
64-Core 267
18% 267 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 83%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-000L7 512GB
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4M2QEXF7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 728 786 787 780 769 770 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
153% Outstanding
Read 1,508
Write 1,266
Mixed 1,115
SusWrite 770
261% 1,165 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 55.3
4K Mixed 25.5
102% 35.6 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 310
240% 331 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 153%
Great: 305%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
31.5% Below average
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 11.6
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 8.9
24% 8.5 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 52%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 90JY0069MW Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: Lenovo 90JY0069MW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $450
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9400F $158Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $344Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $55
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $47Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $67SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback