Performance Results


Gaming 65% Battle cruiser	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 53% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX/GEN3 R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	7.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130117
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Apr 19 '20 at 22:42
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	64.3% Good	Memory 84.8 1-Core 68.6 2-Core 126 58% 93.1 Pts	4-Core 238 8-Core 393 39% 316 Pts	64-Core 382 24% 382 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210 663,603 User benchmarks, average bench 115% Asus(1043 8729) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	103% Outstanding	Lighting 126 Reflection 129 Parallax 133 103% 130 fps	MRender 174 Gravity 124 Splatting 102 105% 133 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 123%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$55 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 232GB free Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 225 221 230 230 229 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	76.2% Very good	Read 340 Write 290 Mixed 248 SusWrite 238 62% 279 MB/s	4K Read 28.8 4K Write 60.1 4K Mixed 36.6 122% 41.8 MB/s	DQ Read 234 DQ Write 214 DQ Mixed 242 176% 230 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 114%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 599GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 314 347 385 375 390 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	94% Outstanding	Read 444 Write 368 Mixed 384 SusWrite 362 88% 390 MB/s	4K Read 33.3 4K Write 64.9 4K Mixed 43.3 140% 47.2 MB/s	DQ Read 270 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 220 166% 226 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 94% Great: 133%
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95 20,246 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 169GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4.AAA SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 39 44 42 45 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	35.4% Below average	Read 81.2 Write 74.7 Mixed 37.3 SusWrite 42.1 43% 58.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 115% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 12GB 105 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	35.2% Below average	MC Read 12.4 MC Write 12 MC Mixed 11.4 34% 11.9 GB/s	SC Read 8.2 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 9.9 25% 8.8 GB/s	Latency 72.1 56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	2x
840 Pro 128GBSamsung $150Bench 90%, 34,842 samples	1x
840 Series 500GBSamsungBench 72%, 7,390 samples	1x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 367 samples	2x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	1x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x4GBKingstonBench 60%, 17,012 samples	1x

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $346

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16