PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 5.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 8.34% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z800 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0AECh |
Memory | 25.4 GB free of 32.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110610 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Apr 19 '20 at 18:51 |
Run Duration | 177 Seconds |
Run User | THA-User |
Background CPU | 6% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5675
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
|
73.5%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro 2000
HP(103C 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.84
|
5.42%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Team T253X2256G 256GB
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 22 14 3.4 10 16 MB/s
|
8.34%
Terrible
|
|||
WD WD40EZRZ-00WN9B0 2TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 122 122 122 123 122 MB/s
|
70.5%
Very good
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
389GB free
Firmware: A750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 123 123 123 124 123 MB/s
|
71.1%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
663GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 167 166 166 165 167 MB/s
|
97.7%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Elements 1TB
33GB free, PID 1042
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 23 23 23 23 MB/s
|
13.4%
Very poor
|
|||
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 64GB
3GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 2.3 2.3 2.2 3.2 MB/s
|
7.7%
Terrible
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples | 318x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples | 188x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples | 179x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 161x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 87x |
Quadro 5000NvidiaBench 10%, 751 samples | 67x |
SSD | |
---|---|
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples | 38x |
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples | 34x |
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 34x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |