PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 1.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 37.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Samsung RV411/RV511/E3511/S3511 (all builds) |
Motherboard | SAMSUNG RV411/RV511/E3511/S3511 |
Memory | 5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20110107 |
Uptime | 18 Days |
Run Date | Apr 18 '20 at 17:14 |
Run Duration | 114 Seconds |
Run User | IRL-User |
Background CPU | 16% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5 M 480
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
|
45.7%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce 315M
Sanyo(144D C581) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 285.62
|
1.31%
Terrible
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 117 114 129 102 65 MB/s
|
37.3%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
23.7%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i3 M 380Intel $130Bench 40%, 21,755 samples | 10x |
Core i5 M 480IntelBench 41%, 16,023 samples | 8x |
Core i3 M 370Intel $167Bench 39%, 23,407 samples | 1x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce 315MNvidiaBench 1%, 3,213 samples | 16x |
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples | 6x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 47% - Average | Total price: $219 |