Huananzhi X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics47.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive143% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardHuananzhi X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.9 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180418
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateApr 17 '20 at 13:15
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 62.7
1-Core 53.2
2-Core 120
47% 78.7 Pts
4-Core 295
8-Core 507
49% 401 Pts
64-Core 822
51% 822 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Gigabyte(1458 2302) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.2.2
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.5% Average
Lighting 59.6
Reflection 59
Parallax 70.5
49% 63 fps
MRender 60.7
Gravity 59.1
Splatting 49.3
45% 56.4 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pcie NVME 512G 512GB
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0.3.0412 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1079 425 379 294 268 252 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
143% Outstanding
Read 1,513
Write 1523
Mixed 1,217
SusWrite 449
263% 1,176 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 63.9
4K Mixed 37.7
127% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 436
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 355
263% 351 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 143%
Great: 216%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
10GB free
Firmware: 070H
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 398
Write 181
Mixed 223
59% 267 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 39.8
4K Mixed 13.3
71% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 29.8
47% 90.5 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 72%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$50
145GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 91 92 92 91 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 106
Write 92.8
Mixed 67.2
SusWrite 91.3
66% 89.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
169% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 74%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
462GB free
Firmware: 12.01C01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 78 79 79 78 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 78.8
Write 77.5
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 78.3
54% 73 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Dimm0_Manufacturer 36JSF1G72PZ-1 Dimm2_Manufacturer 36JSF1G72PZ-1 Dimm6_Manufacturer 36JSF1G72PZ-1 24GB
1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
82.2% Excellent
MC Read 38.3
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 31.3
95% 33.3 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 8.8
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 445 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Huananzhi X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $130
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback