Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 M 640 5,045 User benchmarks, average bench 43% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	48% Average	Memory 66.7 1-Core 49.3 2-Core 125 48% 80.3 Pts	4-Core 171 8-Core 172 23% 172 Pts	64-Core 173 11% 173 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 0487) 3.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.64% Terrible	Lighting 0.67 Reflection 0.92 Parallax 0.66 0% 0.75 fps	MRender 1.1 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.3 1% 0.97 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.64% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 137GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 190 166 168 168 164 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	51.1% Above average	Read 239 Write 230 Mixed 222 SusWrite 177 49% 217 MB/s	4K Read 17.4 4K Write 37 4K Mixed 21.1 73% 25.2 MB/s	DQ Read 191 DQ Write 171 DQ Mixed 180 135% 181 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 124%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 31GB free Firmware: AX1P1A SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 108 107 108 108 108 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	62.1% Good	Read 109 Write 101 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 107 64% 88.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 62%
Generic- Multi-Card 134GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 109GB free, PID 0138 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 2.7 Mixed 2.7 3% 2.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 6% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 1% Great: 5%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M471B5273CH0-CH9 M471B5273DH0-CK0 8GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1067, 1067 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	24.6% Poor	MC Read 7.8 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 10.5 24% 8.4 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 5.6 SC Mixed 6.5 18% 6.23 GB/s	Latency 109 37% 109 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 24.6% Great: 25%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 18%

Surfboard

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium P6100IntelBench 35%, 6,283 samples	40x
Pentium P6200IntelBench 36%, 8,041 samples	35x
Core i3 M 380Intel $130Bench 40%, 21,755 samples	9x

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	107x
Quantic C3PhdgdBench 1%, 86 samples	1x

RAM
ACR256X64D3S1333C9 1x2GBKingstonBench 18%, 620 samples	8x
ACR256X64D3S1333C9 2x2GBKingstonBench 29%, 3,134 samples	7x
NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 2x2GBNanyaBench 31%, 6,518 samples	4x

Value: 15% - Very poor

Total price: $25

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16