Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics140% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive199% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-E WS/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory119.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170808
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 17 '20 at 02:07
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 94.7
2-Core 189
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 753
64% 552 Pts
64-Core 1,686
104% 1,686 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan RTX-$1,477
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
140% Outstanding
Lighting 165
Reflection 219
Parallax 260
134% 215 fps
MRender 293
Gravity 245
Splatting 153
180% 230 fps
Poor: 134%
This bench: 140%
Great: 179%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS2211 960GB-$289
470GB free
Firmware: CS221017
SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 311 315 365 319 321 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 402
Mixed 384
SusWrite 331
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 79
4K Mixed 38.7
136% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 305
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 185
177% 277 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 111%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 767 705 720 731 678 710 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
199% Outstanding
Read 1,962
Write 1,078
Mixed 712
SusWrite 719
247% 1,118 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 87.7
4K Mixed 50.5
174% 60 MB/s
DQ Read 714
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 388
319% 468 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 199%
Great: 283%
PNY CS2211 960GB-$289
329GB free
Firmware: CS221017
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 310 307 120 291 284 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 480
Mixed 379
SusWrite 278
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 74.9
4K Mixed 37.8
134% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 136
151% 253 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 111%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 16TB
791GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 182 172 181 179 177 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 88.2
Write 71
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 173
63% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 6.4
4K Mixed 0.5
224% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 208%
Adaptec Array 16TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 206 201 202 199 198 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 107% Great: 108%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 32GB
24GB free, PID 4000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 88 88 88 89 87 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
39% Below average
Read 89.7
Write 80.7
Mixed 38.7
SusWrite 81.8
96% 72.7 MB/s
4K Read 10
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 2.6
190% 4.83 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 39%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K40BB1-CRC 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
135% Outstanding
MC Read 60.9
MC Write 54.8
MC Mixed 49.4
157% 55 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 17.6
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 135%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-E WS/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $770
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback