Asus A88XM-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	79.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	69.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

4 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus A88XM-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20141205
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Apr 15 '20 at 20:25
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7700K APU (2014 D.Ka) 11,026 User benchmarks, average bench 45% FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.1 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	53.8% Above average	Memory 68.9 1-Core 74.1 2-Core 135 55% 92.6 Pts	4-Core 225 8-Core 228 30% 226 Pts	64-Core 223 14% 223 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$199 254,908 User benchmarks, average bench 98% XFX(1682 5701) Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.1 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	79.3% Very good	Lighting 75.7 Reflection 104 Parallax 258 62% 146 fps	MRender 112 Gravity 139 Splatting 156 114% 136 fps
Poor: 91% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 104%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 120GB-$76 9,139 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 29GB free (System drive) Firmware: X312 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 75 52 59 57 42 MB/s Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	69.1% Good	Read 270 Write 138 Mixed 103 SusWrite 73.4 32% 146 MB/s	4K Read 30.7 4K Write 87.6 4K Mixed 37.2 140% 51.8 MB/s	DQ Read 253 DQ Write 226 DQ Mixed 182 152% 220 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 93%
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 32GB free Firmware: UF40 SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 21 20 21 24 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 33% Great: 56%
Seagate ST3320820AS 320GB-$55 14,577 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 4GB free Firmware: 3.AA SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 53 54 59 54 56 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	32.5% Below average	Read 57.7 Write 26.3 Mixed 30 SusWrite 55.3 31% 42.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.8 137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMY8GX3M2A1866C9 8GB 56 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	22.6% Poor	MC Read 8 MC Write 7.4 MC Mixed 6.5 21% 7.3 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 7.2 19% 6.8 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 22.6% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A88XM-PLUS Builds (Compare 256 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88XM-PLUS

CPU
A10-7700K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 45%, 11,026 samples	36x
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples	33x
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples	19x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	24x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	23x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	19x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	13x
HyperX 3K 120GBKingston $100Bench 74%, 46,066 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	8x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	12x
KHX1866C10D3/4G 8GBKingstonBench 40%, 751 samples	6x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 23% - Poor

Total price: $109

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16