Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics67.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive207% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191007
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 15 '20 at 13:02
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$155
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 95.7
1-Core 152
2-Core 303
101% 183 Pts
4-Core 607
8-Core 794
89% 700 Pts
64-Core 835
52% 835 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 103%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2164 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
67.1% Good
Lighting 83.6
Reflection 85.1
Parallax 82.1
68% 83.6 fps
MRender 75.6
Gravity 80
Splatting 82
65% 79.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$4
419GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 001C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 743 451 295 343 494 489 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 2,390
Write 1,138
Mixed 923
SusWrite 469
270% 1,230 MB/s
4K Read 65.3
4K Write 50.8
4K Mixed 46.9
186% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,118
DQ Write 94.2
DQ Mixed 114
208% 442 MB/s
Poor: 148%
This bench: 207%
Great: 293%
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
104GB free
Firmware: X41100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 199 178 190 175 172 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 489
Write 447
Mixed 334
SusWrite 224
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 51.5
4K Mixed 34.7
120% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 249
212% 312 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
757GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 141 142 141 140 141 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
88% Excellent
Read 166
Write 129
Mixed 94.2
SusWrite 140
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
223% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
655GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 146 147 147 147 146 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
89% Excellent
Read 164
Write 131
Mixed 95.3
SusWrite 146
99% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 89%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 41.1
MC Write 41.1
MC Mixed 33.2
110% 38.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 45.2
SC Mixed 30.9
94% 32.9 GB/s
Latency 55.1
73% 55.1 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 108%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,622 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $709
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback