Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	84.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2960XM 863 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	72.3% Very good	Memory 85.1 1-Core 96.1 2-Core 188 71% 123 Pts	4-Core 328 8-Core 434 48% 381 Pts	64-Core 365 23% 365 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 1000M 6,108 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Dell(1028 14A3) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.745 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM05B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 384 388 370 385 373 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	84.4% Excellent	Read 452 Write 408 Mixed 304 SusWrite 383 87% 387 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 42.6 4K Mixed 27.8 96% 31.8 MB/s	DQ Read 300 DQ Write 291 DQ Mixed 146 151% 246 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 116%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 Kingston KV1RX3-HYC HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 Kingston KV1RX3-HYC 12GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	48.1% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 16.9 MC Mixed 15.2 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 16 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 71.8 56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro 1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 6,108 samples	227x
Quadro 2000MNvidiaBench 5%, 3,227 samples	170x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	85x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	26x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 43%, 6,386 samples	16x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 45%, 885 samples	12x

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $113

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16