Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 156% UFO	Desktop 100% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 153% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	158% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191127
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 15 '20 at 06:07
Run Duration	196 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Memory 91.1 1-Core 150 2-Core 301 99% 181 Pts	4-Core 586 8-Core 981 95% 784 Pts	64-Core 1,447 90% 1,447 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Asus(1043 866A) CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 445.75 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	158% Outstanding	Lighting 221 Reflection 232 Parallax 260 180% 238 fps	MRender 257 Gravity 207 Splatting 143 159% 202 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 158% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 504 Write 443 Mixed 366 97% 438 MB/s	4K Read 45.3 4K Write 120 4K Mixed 59.7 209% 75 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 337 DQ Mixed 354 266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
TEAML5Lite3D480G 480GB 4,595 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 249GB free Firmware: Q0526A SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 453 456 462 462 462 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	125% Outstanding	Read 515 Write 480 Mixed 438 SusWrite 459 106% 473 MB/s	4K Read 38.4 4K Write 117 4K Mixed 57.5 194% 70.9 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 354 DQ Mixed 122 159% 285 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 127%
Corsair Force 3 120GB-$109 22,358 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 21GB free Firmware: 5.02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 96 83 96 95 96 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	61.5% Good	Read 184 Write 122 Mixed 144 SusWrite 94.1 30% 136 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 33.2 139% 55 MB/s	DQ Read 144 DQ Write 132 DQ Mixed 107 89% 128 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 61%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 33GB free Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2690 Write 2,501 Mixed 1951 530% 2,381 MB/s	4K Read 71.1 4K Write 189 4K Mixed 101 337% 120 MB/s	DQ Read 1,356 DQ Write 1,228 DQ Mixed 1,293 970% 1,293 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 193GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 96 96 96 96 97 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	65.4% Good	Read 132 Write 128 Mixed 120 SusWrite 95.9 88% 119 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.9 196% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 85%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 60,540 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 68GB free Firmware: 0710 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 98 99 102 102 98 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	43.9% Average	Read 55 Write 75.7 Mixed 78.3 SusWrite 97.8 57% 76.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 109% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 2x8GB 18,355 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	83.8% Excellent	MC Read 27.7 MC Write 27.1 MC Mixed 31.2 82% 28.7 GB/s	SC Read 27.8 SC Write 26.4 SC Mixed 37.8 88% 30.7 GB/s	Latency 65.5 61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	28x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	20x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $856

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)