Performance Results


Gaming 30% Sail boat	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	32.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2665 0 1,061 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	71% Very good	Memory 87.4 1-Core 73.8 2-Core 148 63% 103 Pts	4-Core 295 8-Core 502 48% 399 Pts	64-Core 736 46% 736 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Zotac(19DA 2454) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.75 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	32.4% Below average	Lighting 40 Reflection 32.1 Parallax 39.2 33% 37.1 fps	MRender 38.9 Gravity 39.8 Splatting 38.2 32% 39 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 280 211 157 130 111 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	53.9% Above average	Read 284 Write 337 Mixed 278 SusWrite 193 62% 273 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 36.4 4K Mixed 27.2 91% 29.4 MB/s	DQ Read 32 DQ Write 72.6 DQ Mixed 28.9 29% 44.5 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 124%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA330 2TB 1,342 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 440GB free Firmware: A3FB SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 37 36 37 37 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	37.6% Below average	Read 94.5 Write 34.5 Mixed 37.7 SusWrite 36.5 37% 50.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.7 122% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 70%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA330 2TB 7,666 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 445GB free Firmware: JKAOA3MA SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 98 97 99 97 97 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	54.6% Above average	Read 92.8 Write 95.3 Mixed 51.3 SusWrite 97.5 62% 84.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron-002C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 Hynix-00AD HMT151R7TFR4C-H9 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	83.7% Excellent	MC Read 35.3 MC Write 33.1 MC Mixed 30.5 94% 33 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 10.3 SC Mixed 10 31% 11 GB/s	Latency 70.1 57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 83.7% Great: 84%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

RAM
M393B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsung-00CEBench 85%, 1,049 samples	147x
HMT351R7CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynix-00ADBench 83%, 808 samples	130x
HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 4x8GBHynix-00ADBench 78%, 761 samples	74x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16