Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412FL_A412FL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive132% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 91% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412FL_A412FL  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X412FL
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190816
Uptime2 Days
Run DateApr 14 '20 at 15:42
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 17%
CPU Throttled 91%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8145U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 85.7
1-Core 102
2-Core 200
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 309
42% 314 Pts
64-Core 293
18% 293 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Asus(1043 1F0E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7372
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
3.51% Terrible
Lighting 5.73
Reflection 14.2
Parallax 6
5% 8.63 fps
MRender 5.33
Gravity 0.03
Splatting 0.09
1% 1.82 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.51%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 75 58 58 42 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 1,176
Write 866
Mixed 812
SusWrite 111
165% 742 MB/s
4K Read 46.6
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 45.7
187% 67.2 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 659
DQ Mixed 215
242% 399 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 132%
Great: 209%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
3GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 20 21 20 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 35.9
Write 34.3
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 20.2
37% 28.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
72% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 63%
Initio MHV2060AH 60GB
9GB free, PID 1040
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 19 21 20 20 21 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 29
Write 27.7
Mixed 20
SusWrite 20.4
32% 24.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
56% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244BB0-CRC 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
34% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 9.2
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 2.1
14% 4.83 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 34%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412FL_A412FL Builds (Compare 70 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412FL_A412FL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback