Asus P5Q-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	6.41% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	27.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P5Q-PRO (all builds)
Memory	3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1862 x 1036 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080710
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 14 '20 at 09:25
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	48%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	35% Below average	Memory 56.7 1-Core 27.4 2-Core 53.6 31% 45.9 Pts	4-Core 76.2 8-Core 95.1 11% 85.6 Pts	64-Core 82.6 5% 82.6 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460-$203 31,648 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Gainward(10B0 0801) 1GB CLim: 851 MHz, MLim: 952 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	6.41% Terrible	Lighting 7.53 Reflection 8.35 Parallax 6.5 6% 7.46 fps	MRender 6.33 Gravity 8.67 Splatting 9.78 7% 8.26 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 6.41% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team L3 EVO SSD 120GB 600 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM10.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 50 53 75 44 39 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.8% Poor	Read 148 Write 118 Mixed 119 SusWrite 60.7 25% 111 MB/s	4K Read 16.3 4K Write 24.4 4K Mixed 15.1 57% 18.6 MB/s	DQ Read 22.8 DQ Write 8.9 DQ Mixed 20.5 14% 17.4 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 85%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159 43,620 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 282GB free Firmware: GM4OA5CA SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 15 41 79 78 75 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	17.6% Very poor	Read 10.5 Write 19.3 Mixed 12.5 SusWrite 50.8 17% 23.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.1 21% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 51%
Maxtor STM3320820AS 320GB 4,234 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 145GB free Firmware: 3.AAE SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 76 78 78 78 78 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	43.9% Average	Read 76.5 Write 45 Mixed 41.4 SusWrite 76.5 44% 59.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 1024, 2048, 1024, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	11.8% Very poor	MC Read 4.1 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 3.4 10% 3.67 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 2.9 SC Mixed 3 8% 2.9 GB/s	Latency 138 29% 138 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5Q-PRO Builds (Compare 363 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5Q-PRO

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	79x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	32x
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples	28x

GPU
HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples	26x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	13x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	12x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	10x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	10x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	198x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	60x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $189

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16