Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 15% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	20.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom Z3740 1,399 User benchmarks, average bench 30% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	32% Below average	Memory 52.6 1-Core 17.6 2-Core 35.2 26% 35.1 Pts	4-Core 68.4 8-Core 70.1 9% 69.2 Pts	64-Core 70.5 4% 70.5 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FAF0) 1GB Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.74% Terrible	Lighting 0.73 Reflection 0.96 Parallax 0.69 1% 0.79 fps	MRender 1.57 Gravity 0.6 Splatting 1.48 1% 1.22 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.74% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MCG8GC 63GB 366 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0.3 Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	20.3% Poor	Read 155 Write 52.7 Mixed 66.2 20% 91.3 MB/s	4K Read 14.9 4K Write 9.15 4K Mixed 4.39 33% 9.48 MB/s	DQ Read 52.8 DQ Write 15.5 DQ Mixed 4.72 11% 24.3 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 23%
Generic 00000 SD Card 63GB 53 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 33GB free Firmware: 1.0 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	11.6% Very poor	Read 22.6 Write 15 Mixed 18 14% 18.5 MB/s	4K Read 7.36 4K Write 2.02 4K Mixed 2.25 594% 3.87 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 11.6% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
To be filled by O.E.M be filled by O.E.M 2x1GB 291 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	21.6% Poor	MC Read 7.9 MC Write 7.9 MC Mixed 8.3 23% 8.03 GB/s	SC Read 2.1 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 3.4 9% 3.3 GB/s	Latency 151 26% 151 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 21.6% Great: 22%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16