Asus TUF H370-PRO GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 40% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	66.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	32.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF H370-PRO GAMING (all builds)
Memory	5.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190403
Uptime	1.4 Days
Run Date	Apr 13 '20 at 12:37
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	100%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	70.7% Very good	Memory 67.3 1-Core 108 2-Core 209 71% 128 Pts	4-Core 413 8-Core 499 59% 456 Pts	64-Core 441 27% 441 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% Asus(1043 86A5) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 442.74 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	66.3% Good	Lighting 84 Reflection 76.8 Parallax 69.2 68% 76.7 fps	MRender 88 Gravity 74.4 Splatting 68.4 62% 76.9 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS480G2G0B-00EPW0 480GB 14,337 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 368GB free (System drive) Firmware: UK500000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 11 2.8 4.6 28 33 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	32.4% Below average	Read 331 Write 48.3 Mixed 197 SusWrite 36.2 34% 153 MB/s	4K Read 10.8 4K Write 18 4K Mixed 11.5 41% 13.4 MB/s	DQ Read 107 DQ Write 88.3 DQ Mixed 33.6 43% 76.4 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 59%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 519GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 71 71 70 72 69 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	45.1% Average	Read 86.2 Write 78.2 Mixed 77.5 SusWrite 70.5 58% 78.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
GEIL CL16-18-18 D4-3000 2x8GB 5,165 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	55.7% Above average	MC Read 24.3 MC Write 19.9 MC Mixed 19.1 60% 21.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 14.8 SC Mixed 10.1 33% 11.4 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF H370-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 512 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 53%

Yacht

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 49%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus TUF H370-PRO GAMING

CPU
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	126x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	79x
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	63x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	51x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	39x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	26x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	28x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	17x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	17x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	23x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	15x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $397

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16