Asus PRIME X470-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	36.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X470-PRO (all builds)
Memory	19.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191113
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Apr 13 '20 at 06:17
Run Duration	181 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	47%

Watch Gameplay: 5700 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	56.5% Above average	Memory 73.9 1-Core 59.3 2-Core 115 51% 82.7 Pts	4-Core 212 8-Core 392 36% 302 Pts	64-Core 618 38% 618 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 5700-$275 75,918 User benchmarks, average bench 85% Asus(1043 04E4) ≥ 4GB Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.3.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	36.9% Below average	Lighting 37.3 Reflection 62.9 Parallax 66 30% 55.4 fps	MRender 37.6 Gravity 46.2 Splatting 86.4 50% 56.7 fps
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 91%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,611 Write 1,552 Mixed 1,368 337% 1510 MB/s	4K Read 43 4K Write 66.5 4K Mixed 53.4 169% 54.3 MB/s	DQ Read 505 DQ Write 430 DQ Mixed 468 350% 468 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 232GB free Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 290 297 301 301 303 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	82.9% Excellent	Read 367 Write 358 Mixed 328 SusWrite 301 76% 338 MB/s	4K Read 30.8 4K Write 63.7 4K Mixed 31.4 121% 42 MB/s	DQ Read 305 DQ Write 280 DQ Mixed 294 220% 293 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 56 55 54 58 59 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	22.2% Poor	Read 20.7 Write 40.2 Mixed 46 SusWrite 56.6 31% 40.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.2 54% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 143 147 146 138 141 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	70.7% Very good	Read 104 Write 131 Mixed 92.5 SusWrite 143 87% 117 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.1 143% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 106%
ICY BOX IB-AC704-6G 1TB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 894GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 46 45 45 44 40 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	16.3% Very poor	Read 31.5 Write 36.5 Mixed 35.3 SusWrite 43.8 52% 36.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.3 35% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 195%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB-$113 87,239 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	81.4% Excellent	MC Read 34.1 MC Write 26.8 MC Mixed 33.9 90% 31.6 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 21.7 SC Mixed 12.5 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 92.6 43% 92.6 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 120%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X470-PRO Builds (Compare 5,560 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X470-PRO - $139

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,949x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	436x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	403x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	285x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	283x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	247x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	285x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	228x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	213x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	278x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	231x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	222x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $635

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X470-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X470-PRO - $139

Feedback

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)