HP Z620 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 91% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 80% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	93.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	46% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP Z620 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 158A
Memory	59.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191029
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 12 '20 at 21:16
Run Duration	194 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2-$635 10,921 User benchmarks, average bench 76% CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	91.8% Outstanding	Memory 93.5 1-Core 121 2-Core 244 86% 153 Pts	4-Core 485 8-Core 726 75% 606 Pts	64-Core 862 53% 862 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 91.8% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Nvidia(10DE 119D) CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2079 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.75 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	93.3% Outstanding	Lighting 118 Reflection 120 Parallax 103 96% 114 fps	MRender 103 Gravity 108 Splatting 109 87% 106 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 93.3% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$82 74,184 User benchmarks, average bench 242% 280GB free Firmware: R0906I Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1323 931 1170 977 518 814 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	233% Outstanding	Read 1,974 Write 527 Mixed 1,332 SusWrite 955 266% 1,197 MB/s	4K Read 37.3 4K Write 144 4K Mixed 58.5 208% 79.8 MB/s	DQ Read 821 DQ Write 580 DQ Mixed 574 463% 658 MB/s
Poor: 147% ↑ This bench: 233% Great: 311%
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40 77,177 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 163GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 110 122 121 123 126 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	46% Average	Read 133 Write 127 Mixed 126 SusWrite 121 28% 127 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 36.2 4K Mixed 28 92% 29.5 MB/s	DQ Read 103 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 98 75% 101 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 123%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 84GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 152 152 152 152 152 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	90.8% Outstanding	Read 466 Write 450 Mixed 398 SusWrite 186 84% 375 MB/s	4K Read 31.4 4K Write 71.6 4K Mixed 44.2 142% 49.1 MB/s	DQ Read 387 DQ Write 343 DQ Mixed 353 268% 361 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 90.8% Great: 115%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 217GB free Firmware: SBFK61K1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 174 60 60 60 60 MB/s Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	54.3% Above average	Read 253 Write 235 Mixed 211 SusWrite 109 45% 202 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 51.2 4K Mixed 24.2 94% 33.1 MB/s	DQ Read 200 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 142 121% 177 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 100%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 924GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 86 85 86 84 87 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	46.9% Average	Read 77.8 Write 76.3 Mixed 75.3 SusWrite 85.4 58% 78.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 456GB free Firmware: CC38 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 128 130 130 128 132 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.6% Very good	Read 137 Write 123 Mixed 71.8 SusWrite 130 84% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-CMA M393B1K70DH0-CMA M393B1K70DH0-CMA M393B1G70QH0-CMA M393B1G70QH0-CMA M393B1K70DH0-CMA M393B1K70DH0-CMA M393B1K70DH0-CMA 64GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	111% Outstanding	MC Read 46.7 MC Write 43 MC Mixed 41.3 125% 43.7 GB/s	SC Read 17.6 SC Write 16.4 SC Mixed 14.6 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 61 66% 61 ns
Poor: 111% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z620 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,392 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

System: HP Z620 Workstation

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	150x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples	146x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	129x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	169x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	113x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	95x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	72x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	68x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	60x

RAM
9965525-138.A00LF 12x8GBKingstonBench 111%, 25 samples	24x
18JDF1G72PZ-1G6E1 8x8GBMicronBench 97%, 23 samples	20x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 83%, 405 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $345

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16