Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics81.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive144% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer CH530
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190709
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 12 '20 at 16:43
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Memory 92.2
1-Core 127
2-Core 243
87% 154 Pts
4-Core 459
8-Core 680
71% 569 Pts
64-Core 854
53% 854 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2005) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7261
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.11% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 11.3
Parallax 8.38
6% 8.87 fps
MRender 12.3
Gravity 7.17
Splatting 15.8
10% 11.7 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.11%
Great: 6%
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)
Device(1A58 2005) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.59
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.8% Excellent
Lighting 98.5
Reflection 108
Parallax 110
80% 105 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 88.7
Splatting 90
85% 106 fps
Poor: 52%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 94%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$130
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.5 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1214 738 734 678 754 747 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
144% Outstanding
Read 1,133
Write 1,385
Mixed 1,167
SusWrite 811
254% 1,124 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 43
4K Mixed 33.3
103% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 638
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 195
188% 312 MB/s
Poor: 148%
This bench: 144%
Great: 322%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 33.9
MC Mixed 28.7
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 34.4
SC Mixed 26.5
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 63.7
63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,023 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback