HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	67.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3397
Memory	0.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121116
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 12 '20 at 13:36
Run Duration	182 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570 104,858 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	75.9% Very good	Memory 84.4 1-Core 100 2-Core 202 74% 129 Pts	4-Core 392 8-Core 381 52% 386 Pts	64-Core 388 24% 388 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz) 146,665 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 3397) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5129 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.78% Terrible	Lighting 1.83 Reflection 1.85 Parallax 1.41 2% 1.7 fps	MRender 3.62 Gravity 1.13 Splatting 3.57 2% 2.77 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.78% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 275GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 236 231 221 218 213 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	67.4% Good	Read 254 Write 235 Mixed 226 SusWrite 225 53% 235 MB/s	4K Read 29.4 4K Write 49.3 4K Mixed 32.8 113% 37.2 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 181 DQ Mixed 165 131% 183 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 134%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB 2,039 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 91GB free, PID a009 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	11.6% Very poor	Read 31.3 Write 23.5 Mixed 20 SusWrite 10.6 27% 21.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.6% Great: 44%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB 848 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 119GB free, PID a00d Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	8.34% Terrible	Read 32.3 Write 23 Mixed 16.5 SusWrite 10.7 26% 20.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.3 25% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 8.34% Great: 46%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 331GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 11 11 11 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	11.3% Very poor	Read 31.7 Write 21.3 Mixed 22.2 SusWrite 10.6 27% 21.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 43%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 3,454 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 34GB free, PID a00d Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	7.37% Terrible	Read 27.7 Write 23 Mixed 15.7 SusWrite 10.7 24% 19.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 25% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 7.37% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 2x2GB 1,140 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	46.9% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 16.8 MC Mixed 14.4 46% 16.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 16.2 SC Mixed 11.5 40% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 72.8 55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 SFF Builds (Compare 5,407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	2,465x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	1,463x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	797x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	1,921x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	725x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	487x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	266x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	83x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	78x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	64x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	56x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	52x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16