Biostar TZ77B

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics146% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive56.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar TZ77B  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120823
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 12 '20 at 08:47
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Memory 95
1-Core 124
2-Core 237
87% 152 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 604
59% 485 Pts
64-Core 616
38% 616 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
EVGA(3842 2382) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
146% Outstanding
Lighting 197
Reflection 213
Parallax 225
160% 211 fps
MRender 244
Gravity 199
Splatting 134
151% 192 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 146%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 137 146 143 138 139 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.1% Above average
Read 229
Write 214
Mixed 199
SusWrite 141
44% 196 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 46.5
4K Mixed 34.7
114% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 38.5
DQ Write 88.3
DQ Mixed 49.1
42% 58.6 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 118%
Corsair Force GT 240GB-$499
223GB free
Firmware: 5.02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 205 214 209 206 186 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53% Above average
Read 202
Write 211
Mixed 186
SusWrite 204
45% 201 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 47.2
4K Mixed 27.5
96% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 30.2
DQ Write 86.6
DQ Mixed 38.2
35% 51.7 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 53%
Great: 92%
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
744GB free
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 142 147 144 139 140 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 376
Write 369
Mixed 272
SusWrite 143
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 56.6
4K Mixed 33
109% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 31.7
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 44.2
41% 61.6 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 117%
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
930GB free
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 144 147 143 140 139 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.2% Above average
Read 228
Write 195
Mixed 184
SusWrite 142
42% 187 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 46.5
4K Mixed 29.6
99% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 30
DQ Write 85.8
DQ Mixed 40.6
36% 52.1 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 117%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 144 147 143 140 139 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 157
Write 103
Mixed 74
SusWrite 142
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SUPERTALENT02 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
57.4% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 17.7
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 19.2
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 57.2
70% 57.2 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TZ77B Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar TZ77B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $308
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback