Asus Z10PA-D8 Series

Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 51% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	63.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	85.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Asus Z10PA-D8 Series (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Z10PA-D8 Series
Memory	60.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160418
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 24 '17 at 23:31
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 2,624 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	69.8% Good	Memory 79.3 1-Core 91.2 2-Core 182 68% 118 Pts	4-Core 325 8-Core 510 52% 418 Pts	64-Core 1,227 76% 1,227 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 3716) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 376.33 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	63.4% Good	Lighting 80.1 Reflection 78.3 Parallax 67.5 65% 75.3 fps	MRender 72.5 Gravity 74.4 Splatting 71.9 60% 72.9 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
LSI MR9271-4i 10TB 7.5TB free Firmware: 3.46 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

LSI MR9271-4i 1TB 685GB free Firmware: 3.46 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 268GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1263 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 501 (B1) Unknown 99 99 15 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 53 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 19 (EB) Unknown 99 99 92 (F1) Unknown 99 99 5267658598	85.9% Excellent	Read 490 Write 456 Mixed 476 106% 474 MB/s	4K Read 29.9 4K Write 76.7 4K Mixed 18.5 110% 41.7 MB/s	DQ Read 25.2 DQ Write 268 DQ Mixed 15.8 51% 103 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 85.9% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A1G43DB0-CPB 8x8GB 232 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	97.8% Outstanding	MC Read 42.9 MC Write 35.8 MC Mixed 36.5 110% 38.4 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 16.9 SC Mixed 19.4 46% 16.1 GB/s	Latency 81.8 49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 97.8% Great: 127%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z10PA-D8 Series Builds (Compare 112 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 88%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 117%

UFO

System: Asus Z10PA-D8 Series

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2678 v31stBench 67%, 867 samples	13x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v31stBench 68%, 414 samples	8x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2696 v41stBench 71%, 283 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	11x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	9x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	8x

SSD
MZVLQ256HBJD-00BH1 256GBSamsungBench 115%, 2,359 samples	8x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	5x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	4x

RAM
HMA84GR7MFR4N-UH 8x31.9GBHynixBench 117%, 105 samples	6x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 8x16GBSamsungBench 112%, 591 samples	5x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 4x16GBSamsungBench 92%, 1,230 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16