Blade Shadow Computer

Performance Results

Gaming 52%
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics85.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive39% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemBlade Shadow Computer  (all builds)
MotherboardBlade ShadowM
Memory8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1400 x 980 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190103
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 11 '20 at 21:33
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 79%

 PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
38.3% Below average
Memory 53.8
1-Core 33.4
2-Core 66.7
34% 51.3 Pts
4-Core 125
8-Core 204
21% 165 Pts
64-Core 205
14% 205 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P5000
Nvidia(10DE 11B2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1733 MHz, MLim: 2256 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 442.50
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
85.9% Excellent
Lighting 170
Reflection 188
Parallax 329
45% 229 fps
MRender 196
Gravity 332
Splatting 203
88% 243 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 101%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 90 96 93 41 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
39% Below average
Read 498
Write 99
Mixed 187
SusWrite 74.6
47% 215 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 6.5
51% 12.4 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 39%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Blade 2LO3PJ1LMZZGHQ-732 1x12GB
1 of 1 slots used
12GB DIMM RAM clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
8.25% Terrible
MC Read 2.2
MC Write 2.6
MC Mixed 2.1
7% 2.3 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 2.1
SC Mixed 2.1
6% 2.17 GB/s
Latency 147
27% 147 ns
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Shadow Computer Builds (Compare 1,662 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 80%
Desktop 57%
Workstation 50%

System: Blade Shadow Computer

The Best.
Intel Core i5-9600K $190Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9400F $156Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $47Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $67SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback