Asus Q170M-C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Q170M-C  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190724
Uptime8.7 Days
Run DateApr 11 '20 at 15:34
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 86.9
1-Core 116
2-Core 239
82% 147 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 649
64% 522 Pts
64-Core 634
39% 634 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 80%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
282GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 837 420 352 328 339 320 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 133%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215
4.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 111 109 112 114 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 103
Write 102
Mixed 76.8
SusWrite 112
73% 98.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 97%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
3TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 125 136 142 147 142 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 134
Write 120
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 139
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.9
265% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 94%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 134 145 150 150 148 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 115
Write 133
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 146
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.6
220% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 92%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78
2TB free
Firmware: MK7OA840
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 98 96 100 99 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
66% Good
Read 131
Write 136
Mixed 74.3
SusWrite 98.7
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
167% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 66%
Great: 82%
Kingston DataTraveler G3 2GB
1GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 7.1 7 7 7 6.9 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
7.02% Terrible
Read 24.2
Write 6.5
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 7
10% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 8.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
31% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.02%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB-$46
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41% Average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 11.8
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 14.3
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Q170M-C Builds (Compare 347 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Q170M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $355
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback