Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive64.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140605
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 11 '20 at 09:57
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 75
2-Core 140
62% 99.8 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 470
46% 366 Pts
64-Core 472
32% 472 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$770
Gigabyte(1458 3FF3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
116% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 148
Parallax 185
100% 152 fps
MRender 201
Gravity 160
Splatting 113
134% 158 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 116%
Great: 147%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$90
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 55 39 53 36 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 394
Write 376
Mixed 298
SusWrite 64.6
63% 283 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 60.1
4K Mixed 39.4
133% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 41.3
DQ Write 92.3
DQ Mixed 51.9
44% 61.8 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 115%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$110
56GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 325 338 334 341 344 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 365
Write 351
Mixed 301
SusWrite 328
76% 336 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 49
4K Mixed 35.3
115% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 36.3
DQ Write 89.5
DQ Mixed 48.8
41% 58.2 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
50GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 57 44 53 36 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
67% Good
Read 396
Write 372
Mixed 326
SusWrite 66.5
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 62.8
4K Mixed 43.7
140% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 42
DQ Write 94.5
DQ Mixed 55.7
46% 64.1 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 67%
Great: 122%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$80
758GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 87
Write 98
Mixed 52.5
59% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 59%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
179GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 50 50 51 51 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
29.1% Poor
Read 51
Write 46.8
Mixed 36.2
SusWrite 50
34% 46 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.3% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 7.9
24% 8.53 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 8.5
23% 8.2 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 970 Extreme3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,207 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0 - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $505
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback