Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 M 620 9,076 User benchmarks, average bench 42% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	40.4% Average	Memory 62.6 1-Core 63.1 2-Core 91.4 46% 72.4 Pts	4-Core 104 8-Core 130 15% 117 Pts	64-Core 138 8% 138 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4350 1,871 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 1471) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.28% Terrible	Lighting 1.63 Reflection 2.65 Parallax 1.22 1% 1.84 fps	MRender 1.48 Gravity 0.63 Splatting 2 1% 1.37 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.28% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 279GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 211 206 177 196 217 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	57.4% Above average	Read 235 Write 215 Mixed 198 SusWrite 199 48% 211 MB/s	4K Read 20.9 4K Write 39.5 4K Mixed 28 88% 29.5 MB/s	DQ Read 191 DQ Write 173 DQ Mixed 178 134% 181 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 134%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	20.9% Poor	MC Read 6.9 MC Write 6 MC Mixed 8 20% 6.97 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 5.9 16% 5.67 GB/s	Latency 120 33% 120 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 20.9% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 4350ATIBench 1%, 1,871 samples	47x
Mobility Radeon HD 530vATIBench 1%, 250 samples	5x
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	2x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16