Asus X505BP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus X505BP  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X505BP
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190530
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateApr 09 '20 at 21:58
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A9-9420 APU (2016 M.SR)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Memory 61.3
1-Core 65.4
2-Core 100
47% 75.6 Pts
4-Core 98.3
8-Core 98.4
13% 98.4 Pts
64-Core 101
6% 101 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Asus(1043 1B70) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.12
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
3.25% Terrible
Lighting 3.77
Reflection 6
Parallax 4.66
3% 4.81 fps
MRender 3.67
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5.26
4% 4.28 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.25%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 120GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 123 73 113 51 70 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 363
Write 298
Mixed 272
SusWrite 95.4
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 67.2
4K Mixed 25
116% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 164
143% 211 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Micron 8ATF51264HZ-2G1B1 8GB
2400, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 7.6
22% 7.67 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 7.7
20% 6.87 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 23%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X505BP Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X505BP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback