Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	51.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus Crosshair IV Formula (all builds)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121009
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 09 '20 at 11:05
Run Duration	255 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8150-$770 22,181 User benchmarks, average bench 59% AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	66.3% Good	Memory 81.1 1-Core 84.1 2-Core 154 64% 106 Pts	4-Core 279 8-Core 454 45% 366 Pts	64-Core 452 28% 452 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Sapphire(174B E347) CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.12.1 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	51.1% Above average	Lighting 62.5 Reflection 67.7 Parallax 92.2 51% 74.1 fps	MRender 68.4 Gravity 67.4 Splatting 55.4 51% 63.7 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Crucial BX100 250GB-$141 42,930 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 150GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 548 269 246 36 541 241 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 59% Great: 103%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$50 94,145 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 1TB free Firmware: CC41 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 106 105 104 105 104 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	57.6% Above average	Read 95.5 Write 75.9 Mixed 65.9 SusWrite 104 63% 85.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 1.5 298% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 108%
Seagate Expansion 2TB 49,966 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2TB free Firmware: 0637 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 87 81 83 87 84 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	57.5% Above average	Read 113 Write 90.2 Mixed 62.4 SusWrite 86.5 65% 88.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1.1 203% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 67%
Seagate M3 Portable 4TB 5,513 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 162GB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 33 35 35 37 39 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	26.3% Poor	Read 56.9 Write 59.8 Mixed 56.9 SusWrite 32.5 38% 51.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 5.8 4K Mixed 0.3 216% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 65%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 11GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	7.94% Terrible	Read 27.9 Write 16.9 Mixed 13.2 SusWrite 14.2 22% 18 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 16% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.94% Great: 23%
WD Elements 25A3 10TB 3,723 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 7.5TB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 184 191 192 186 189 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	78.6% Very good	Read 155 Write 173 Mixed 110 SusWrite 187 215% 156 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 1.2 214% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMY8GX3M2A2133C11 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX CMY8GX3M2A2133C11 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	43.6% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 15.4 MC Mixed 14.4 44% 15.4 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 12.8 31% 10.8 GB/s	Latency 78.6 51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 25%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

CPU
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	120x
Phenom II X6 1100TAMD $340Bench 59%, 12,769 samples	35x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	31x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	15x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	12x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	10x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x
INTENSO 240GBBench 77%, 887 samples	8x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	8x
F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH 8GBUnknownBench 39%, 26 samples	5x
F3-10666CL9-4GBRL F3-10666CL9-4GBRL 8GBUnknownBench 44%, 282 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $520

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16