Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7

Performance Results


Gaming 97% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 100% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 83% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	99.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	280% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7 (all builds)
Memory	8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191128
Uptime	2.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 09 '20 at 00:44
Run Duration	265 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8600K-$173 264,837 User benchmarks, average bench 91% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	92.9% Outstanding	Memory 96.3 1-Core 133 2-Core 265 92% 165 Pts	4-Core 482 8-Core 708 74% 595 Pts	64-Core 759 47% 759 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 92.9% Great: 101%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Gigabyte(1458 3702) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.75 Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	99.6% Outstanding	Lighting 127 Reflection 139 Parallax 124 104% 130 fps	MRender 108 Gravity 127 Splatting 104 92% 113 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 99.6% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 352GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 870 623 624 613 606 602 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	280% Outstanding	Read 2,257 Write 2,098 Mixed 1,574 SusWrite 656 368% 1,646 MB/s	4K Read 59.6 4K Write 145 4K Mixed 83 274% 95.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,606 DQ Write 1,318 DQ Mixed 1,371 1,052% 1432 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 280% Great: 340%
Kingston A400 120GB-$30 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 19GB free Firmware: SBFKB1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 133 134 135 134 133 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	78.6% Very good	Read 284 Write 158 Mixed 353 SusWrite 150 53% 236 MB/s	4K Read 33.8 4K Write 87.1 4K Mixed 39.7 148% 53.5 MB/s	DQ Read 254 DQ Write 309 DQ Mixed 186 167% 250 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 85%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 633GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 141 140 141 141 140 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	82.5% Excellent	Read 146 Write 136 Mixed 90.8 SusWrite 140 94% 128 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1.3 262% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 207GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 117 115 114 114 115 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	84.4% Excellent	Read 180 Write 140 Mixed 85.5 SusWrite 114 95% 130 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 114%
Imation Nano Pro 4GB 132 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID 063d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 5.6 5.2 5.8 5.7 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	6.06% Terrible	Read 21.8 Write 15.7 Mixed 1.7 SusWrite 5.4 13% 11.2 MB/s	4K Read 7.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 27% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.06% Great: 7%
Imation Nano Pro 4GB 132 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 4GB free, PID 063d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 3.6 5.1 5.1 4.9 4.4 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	6% Terrible	Read 21.3 Write 11.7 Mixed 4 SusWrite 5 12% 10.5 MB/s	4K Read 7.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 29% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6% Great: 7%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 13,169 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 14GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 8.1 7.6 8.4 7.2 7.8 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	7.72% Terrible	Read 26.8 Write 6.3 Mixed 15.7 SusWrite 7.2 16% 14 MB/s	4K Read 9.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 36% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 7.72% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$45 653,654 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	94.8% Outstanding	MC Read 38 MC Write 35.8 MC Mixed 27.9 97% 33.9 GB/s	SC Read 19.8 SC Write 32.5 SC Mixed 27.7 76% 26.7 GB/s	Latency 52.8 76% 52.8 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 94.8% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 3,963 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 112%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7 - $221

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	2,882x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	210x
Core i7-8086KIntel $399Bench 91%, 38,086 samples	182x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	754x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	359x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	295x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	210x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	169x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	158x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	186x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	173x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	128x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $1,049

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16