MSI Z370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B61)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 119%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B61
MotherboardMSI Z370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B61)  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171027
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateApr 08 '20 at 19:07
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$173
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Memory 96.1
1-Core 132
2-Core 260
91% 162 Pts
4-Core 530
8-Core 771
81% 650 Pts
64-Core 760
47% 760 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 442.59
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
120% Outstanding
Lighting 165
Reflection 178
Parallax 176
134% 173 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 164
Splatting 117
108% 133 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 120%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$33
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 001C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,038
Write 1139
Mixed 1,047
310% 1,408 MB/s
4K Read 58.8
4K Write 155
4K Mixed 75.2
267% 96.2 MB/s
DQ Read 812
DQ Write 1,008
DQ Mixed 621
549% 814 MB/s
Poor: 131% Great: 244%
WD Blue 500GB-$94
90GB free
Firmware: X41000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 305 219 190 57 95 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 470
Mixed 337
SusWrite 213
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 50.1
181% 67 MB/s
DQ Read 326
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 248
204% 291 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 103%
Great: 107%
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
54GB free
Firmware: 411030WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 264 259 251 250 252 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 478
Write 463
Mixed 360
SusWrite 282
89% 395 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 51
178% 64.6 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 254
215% 316 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 107%
Great: 111%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
489GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 158 159 160 160 159 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Read 157
Write 156
Mixed 100
SusWrite 159
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 145 145 148 147 146 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 124
Mixed 82
SusWrite 146
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 96%
SD Card Reader 128GB
88GB free, PID 2731
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 60 60 60 61 61 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 90.5
Write 58.8
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 59.5
88% 68.3 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 4
262% 4.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$36
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
MC Read 39.8
MC Write 38.1
MC Mixed 28.8
102% 35.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 37.3
SC Mixed 30.4
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 53.6
75% 53.6 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B61) Builds (Compare 7,243 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI Z370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B61) - $125

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $834
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback