PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 53.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 44.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock Z68 Pro3 Gen3 (all builds) |
Memory | 6.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120629 |
Uptime | 3.1 Days |
Run Date | Apr 07 '20 at 17:13 |
Run Duration | 159 Seconds |
Run User | FIN-User |
Background CPU | 20% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-2600-$197
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
|
66.3%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 862C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 442.59
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
53.9%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 144 123 133 199 186 MB/s
|
44.8%
Average
|
|||
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$129
417GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 356 363 364 359 352 MB/s
|
75.3%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 159 159 164 136 159 MB/s
|
69.9%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
3TB free, PID 3320
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 158 160 159 160 159 MB/s
|
63.3%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 KHX1600C10D3/4G 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
41.2%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 90x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 21x |
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 21x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 23x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 16x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 16x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $391 |