Razer Blade Pro 17 (2019)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive190% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemRazer Blade Pro 17 (2019)  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DA720
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190516
Uptime3.4 Days
Run DateApr 07 '20 at 14:51
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User BLR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Memory 90.7
1-Core 114
2-Core 260
86% 155 Pts
4-Core 497
8-Core 702
75% 599 Pts
64-Core 817
51% 817 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080 (Mobile Max-Q)
Device(1A58 3000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 425.54
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Lighting 125
Reflection 140
Parallax 126
102% 130 fps
MRender 158
Gravity 115
Splatting 100
99% 124 fps
Poor: 73%
This bench: 101%
Great: 102%
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 3000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7261
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.69% Terrible
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 11.6
Parallax 8.59
6% 9.29 fps
MRender 13.3
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 16.2
10% 12.3 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.69%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CA3-8D512 512GB
330GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C490903
SusWrite @10s intervals: 740 456 451 435 460 495 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 1,283
Write 1,764
Mixed 1249
SusWrite 506
271% 1,201 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 49.2
179% 65.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,280
DQ Write 1,083
DQ Mixed 949
775% 1,104 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 190%
Great: 228%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74
238GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1137 168 104 99 99 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 683
Write 323
Mixed 900
SusWrite 283
123% 547 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 53.4
182% 68.3 MB/s
DQ Read 627
DQ Write 656
DQ Mixed 267
304% 517 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 130%
Great: 255%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
81.2% Excellent
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 23
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 26
73% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Pro 17 (2019) Builds (Compare 171 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade Pro 17 (2019)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback