HP Z400 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	13.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	40.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP Z400 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0B4Ch
Memory	9.3 GB free of 12.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20101029
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 07 '20 at 09:43
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W3550 7,649 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	66.7% Good	Memory 89.1 1-Core 67.2 2-Core 152 62% 103 Pts	4-Core 245 8-Core 326 36% 285 Pts	64-Core 396 24% 396 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460-$203 31,648 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Gigabyte(1458 34FC) 1GB CLim: 715 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	Lighting 15.4 Reflection 18 Parallax 13.9 12% 15.8 fps	MRender 22 Gravity 15.7 Splatting 18.2 15% 18.6 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: 603A SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 64 72 67 52 61 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	40.8% Average	Read 182 Write 121 Mixed 142 SusWrite 64 28% 127 MB/s	4K Read 13.1 4K Write 52.2 4K Mixed 24.7 79% 30 MB/s	DQ Read 90.1 DQ Write 123 DQ Mixed 101 78% 105 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 73%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59 47,815 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 35GB free Firmware: JP2O SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 84 83 85 85 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	44.1% Average	Read 70.1 Write 68.4 Mixed 41.5 SusWrite 83.4 48% 65.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 74%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 706GB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 110 110 111 112 113 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	65.8% Good	Read 118 Write 101 Mixed 73.1 SusWrite 111 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 84%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB 7,241 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1TB free, PID 3320 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 24 24 24 24 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	13% Very poor	Read 28 Write 23.4 Mixed 23.5 SusWrite 24.5 33% 24.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 64% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:01 98 9965432-027.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-027.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-027.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-027.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-027.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-027.A00LF 46GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 34816 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	40% Below average	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 11.9 MC Mixed 15 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 9.6 25% 8.8 GB/s	Latency 68.3 58% 68.3 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,317 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP Z400 Workstation

CPU
Xeon W3520Intel $230Bench 63%, 6,508 samples	569x
Xeon W3550IntelBench 66%, 7,649 samples	534x
Xeon W3565IntelBench 67%, 7,121 samples	488x

GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	272x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	155x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	137x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	136x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	73x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	65x

RAM
ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 42GBUnknownBench 37%, 128 samples	22x
ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 46GBUnknownBench 45%, 108 samples	18x
ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 46GBUnknownBench 46%, 280 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $258

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16