Biostar H310MHG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics47.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar H310MHG  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190411
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateApr 07 '20 at 09:32
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$88
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
88% Excellent
Memory 88.5
1-Core 129
2-Core 258
88% 159 Pts
4-Core 505
8-Core 506
68% 505 Pts
64-Core 467
29% 467 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Asus(1043 051D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1256 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.1
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
47.9% Average
Lighting 59.2
Reflection 62
Parallax 75
48% 65.4 fps
MRender 63.8
Gravity 58.2
Splatting 53.3
47% 58.4 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
78GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 296 296 296 296 296 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 459
Mixed 401
SusWrite 313
93% 414 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 60
201% 70.9 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 350
264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 117%
Great: 124%
WD Green 500GB (2012)
214GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 62 70 75 82 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 80.2
Write 82.7
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 71.6
48% 65.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
101% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 79%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37
53GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 81 80 47 31 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 98.2
Write 94.2
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 66.1
59% 80.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL16-18-18 D4-3200 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2267 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.7% Very good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 22.5
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 24.7
SC Mixed 22.3
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310MHG Builds (Compare 80 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Biostar H310MHG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $231
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback