Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics79.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory72GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 72GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory67.1 GB free of 72 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 07 '20 at 00:04
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 95.9
2-Core 190
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 639
62% 510 Pts
64-Core 794
49% 794 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
PNY(196E 119D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.9% Very good
Lighting 99.4
Reflection 111
Parallax 92.2
81% 101 fps
MRender 95.5
Gravity 91.6
Splatting 97
78% 94.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
350GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 404 399 394 400 397 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 459
Write 444
Mixed 349
SusWrite 398
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 84.3
4K Mixed 45.1
155% 54.7 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 357
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 107%
Great: 134%
Kingston SHSS37A480G 480GB
188GB free
Firmware: SAFM00.Y
SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 376 396 393 401 399 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 443
Write 452
Mixed 310
SusWrite 393
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 80
4K Mixed 32.1
121% 45.7 MB/s
DQ Read 311
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 67.1
122% 239 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 110%
Samsung 860 Pro 2TB-$474
1.5TB free
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 405 402 397 402 403 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 460
Write 439
Mixed 413
SusWrite 402
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 88.3
4K Mixed 46.9
158% 56.3 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 353
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 108%
Great: 131%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSA.M16FA Kingston KHX2400C15/16G BLS8G4D240FSA.M16FA Kingston KHX2400C15D4/8G BLS8G4D240FSA.M16FA Kingston KHX2400C15D4/8G BLS8G4D240FSA.M16FA Kingston KHX2400C15D4/8G 72GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
111% Outstanding
MC Read 45
MC Write 40.8
MC Mixed 44.4
124% 43.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 21.3
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,285 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $371
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback