Gigabyte GA-X299X AORUS MASTER

Performance Results


Gaming 124% UFO	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 136% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	148% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	276% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X299X AORUS MASTER (all builds)
Memory	52.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191210
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 06 '20 at 19:55
Run Duration	232 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900X-$590 3,521 User benchmarks, average bench 84% CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	83.2% Excellent	Memory 70.6 1-Core 125 2-Core 252 80% 149 Pts	4-Core 512 8-Core 947 87% 730 Pts	64-Core 1,696 105% 1,696 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 83.2% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Gigabyte(1458 37BD) CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3535 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 445.75 Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	148% Outstanding	Lighting 195 Reflection 229 Parallax 245 159% 223 fps	MRender 256 Gravity 218 Splatting 142 161% 205 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 148% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 324GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2285 823 813 831 813 823 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	276% Outstanding	Read 2,265 Write 2175 Mixed 1,585 SusWrite 1,065 397% 1,773 MB/s	4K Read 56.1 4K Write 144 4K Mixed 76.4 259% 92.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,012 DQ Write 778 DQ Mixed 908 676% 899 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 276% Great: 355%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 231GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2192 840 803 808 811 806 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	279% Outstanding	Read 2,232 Write 1,837 Mixed 1,719 SusWrite 1,043 382% 1,708 MB/s	4K Read 57.4 4K Write 144 4K Mixed 79 264% 93.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,114 DQ Write 850 DQ Mixed 1021 753% 995 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 279% Great: 355%
WD My Passport 259D 1.5TB 172 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1TB free, PID 259d Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 99 96 99 97 98 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	39.6% Below average	Read 85 Write 85.7 Mixed 50.5 SusWrite 97.6 108% 79.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 44%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB 31,793 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 587GB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 78 78 78 77 78 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	44% Average	Read 95.5 Write 87.7 Mixed 64.3 SusWrite 77.7 108% 81.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0.8 175% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 59%
WD My Passport 0837 2TB 1,416 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 688GB free, PID 0837 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 99 99 101 100 102 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	41.9% Average	Read 95 Write 96 Mixed 55.7 SusWrite 100 117% 86.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x16GB 9,153 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	86.1% Excellent	MC Read 27.8 MC Write 46.7 MC Mixed 28.6 98% 34.4 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 20.9 SC Mixed 8.8 34% 11.9 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 86.1% Great: 140%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X299X AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 344 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 174%

UFO

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 189%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299X AORUS MASTER

CPU
Core i9-10900XIntelBench 85%, 6,322 samples	82x
Core i9-10980XEIntel $1,100Bench 84%, 4,959 samples	79x
Core i9-10920XIntel $850Bench 87%, 3,007 samples	52x

GPU
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,148Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	43x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	41x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	28x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	53x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	24x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	19x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	83x
4x16GBUnknownBench 98%, 9,153 samples	61x
8x8GBUnknownBench 94%, 4,255 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 49% - Average

Total price: $1,237

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16