Microelectronics G705

Performance Results


Gaming 88% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 87% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Microelectronics G705 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASRock B450 Pro4
Memory	51.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190621
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Apr 06 '20 at 18:40
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	82.7% Excellent	Memory 76.8 1-Core 124 2-Core 243 81% 148 Pts	4-Core 475 8-Core 789 77% 632 Pts	64-Core 1,218 75% 1,218 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 82.7% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250 254,908 User benchmarks, average bench 98% PowerColor(148C 2398) Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.8.1 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Lighting 129 Reflection 110 Parallax 212 105% 150 fps	MRender 112 Gravity 125 Splatting 154 109% 130 fps
Poor: 91% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 104%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 1TB 27,887 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 416GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT22B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 416 425 436 426 428 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 451 Write 465 Mixed 342 SusWrite 425 95% 421 MB/s	4K Read 28 4K Write 82.7 4K Mixed 35.7 132% 48.8 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 361 DQ Mixed 283 237% 343 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 133%
Hitachi HUH721010ALE600 10TB 447 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 7.5TB free Firmware: LHGNT384 SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 218 216 209 201 215 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	119% Outstanding	Read 200 Write 196 Mixed 88 SusWrite 213 127% 174 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 1.1 266% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 135%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS16G4D32AESE.M16FE 4x16GB 523 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	71.7% Very good	MC Read 27.1 MC Write 24.1 MC Mixed 24.2 72% 25.1 GB/s	SC Read 21.4 SC Write 26.7 SC Mixed 25 70% 24.4 GB/s	Latency 86.6 46% 86.6 ns
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 143%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G705 Builds (Compare 55 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 76%

Battleship

System: Microelectronics G705

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	43x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $150Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	4x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4x

GPU
RX 5700-XTAMD $250Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	35x
RTX 3060Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	3x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	3x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	16x
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBWD $68Bench 204%, 97,624 samples	13x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	2x

RAM
GKE800UD102408-2666 2x8GBUnknownBench 80%, 5,112 samples	30x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $68Bench 85%, 86,372 samples	3x
CL16-18-18 D4-3000 2x16GBUnknownBench 81%, 2,810 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $520

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16