Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 22% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	5.91% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	32% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-MA69GM-S2H (all builds)
Memory	1.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20070803
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Apr 06 '20 at 06:34
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4800+-$150 1,985 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	42.1% Average	Memory 72.8 1-Core 35.6 2-Core 69.4 40% 59.3 Pts	4-Core 69.8 8-Core 69.8 9% 69.8 Pts	64-Core 69.9 4% 69.9 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3800 3,400 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 0234) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.753.2.0 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	5.91% Terrible	Lighting 6.97 Reflection 10.5 Parallax 2.06 6% 6.5 fps	MRender 6.62 Gravity 3 Splatting 12 6% 7.19 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.91% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 256GB-$261 25,763 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM03B1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 64 61 61 66 64 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32% Below average	Read 156 Write 141 Mixed 92 SusWrite 65 25% 113 MB/s	4K Read 16.7 4K Write 34.5 4K Mixed 17.7 66% 23 MB/s	DQ Read 20.5 DQ Write 43.9 DQ Mixed 19 18% 27.8 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 86%
Seagate Expansion 2TB 1,450 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 823GB free, PID 231a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 18 18 18 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	17% Very poor	Read 22 Write 22.8 Mixed 22.3 SusWrite 17.5 29% 21.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 1 145% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 49%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 2,465 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 6GB free, PID 2320 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 18 19 18 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	11.3% Very poor	Read 23 Write 20.8 Mixed 20.2 SusWrite 17.6 27% 20.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	21.4% Poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 6 MC Mixed 6.8 20% 6.83 GB/s	SC Read 6.3 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 5.5 17% 5.97 GB/s	Latency 95 42% 95 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 21.4% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Phenom II X4 945AMDBench 51%, 12,746 samples	2x
Phenom II X4 830AMDBench 52%, 1,495 samples	1x
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 3800+AMD $84Bench 34%, 2,640 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 9800 GTNvidiaBench 5%, 19,550 samples	1x
GTX 260Nvidia $250Bench 7%, 11,945 samples	1x
HD 7770AMDBench 12%, 38,053 samples	1x

SSD
520 Series 240GBIntel $139Bench 78%, 12,595 samples	1x
T253LE120G 120GBTeamBench 68%, 3,175 samples	1x
T253X6001T 1TBTeamBench 76%, 2,856 samples	1x

Value: 8% - Terrible

Total price: $139

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16