Asus G11CD

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	56.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus G11CD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G11CD
Memory	7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160203
Uptime	5.7 Days
Run Date	Apr 06 '20 at 00:19
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	18%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$79 171,457 User benchmarks, average bench 61% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	54.6% Above average	Memory 81.4 1-Core 74.5 2-Core 170 63% 109 Pts	4-Core 153 8-Core 249 24% 201 Pts	64-Core 270 17% 270 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 872C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 442.50 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (71 fps cap detected)	56.9% Above average	Lighting 70.1 Reflection 72.3 Parallax 71 57% 71.1 fps	MRender 70.5 Gravity 65.9 Splatting 69.6 56% 68.7 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK512TBN 512GB 2,512 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0MA020 SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 258 249 219 219 217 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	65% Good	Read 331 Write 400 Mixed 209 SusWrite 235 66% 294 MB/s	4K Read 16.7 4K Write 44.3 4K Mixed 24.1 80% 28.4 MB/s	DQ Read 323 DQ Write 245 DQ Mixed 227 185% 265 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 101%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 443GB free Firmware: MS2OA7L0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 157 157 159 158 159 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	87.9% Excellent	Read 150 Write 144 Mixed 30 SusWrite 157 87% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 87.9% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 2x8GB 6,881 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	63.2% Good	MC Read 24.1 MC Write 23.6 MC Mixed 20 64% 22.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 21.8 SC Mixed 18.4 51% 17.9 GB/s	Latency 78 51% 78 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G11CD Builds (Compare 2,162 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

System: Asus G11CD

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	1,262x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	811x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	60x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	465x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	370x
GTX 950Nvidia $100Bench 26%, 111,509 samples	190x

SSD
SD8SB8U512G1002 512GBSandiskBench 81%, 2,367 samples	171x
HFS256G32MND-2200A 256GBBench 70%, 3,087 samples	80x
SD8SBAT128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 58%, 3,654 samples	73x

RAM
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 73%, 22,760 samples	346x
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 1x8GBHynixBench 39%, 16,202 samples	334x
ASU21D4U5S8MB-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 67%, 1,185 samples	143x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 103% - Outstanding

Total price: $196

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16