Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T9600-$170 2,726 User benchmarks, average bench 39% Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	40.9% Average	Memory 69.9 1-Core 38.5 2-Core 72.5 40% 60.3 Pts	4-Core 72.1 8-Core 72.6 10% 72.3 Pts	64-Core 72 4% 72 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family 23,924 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Dell(1028 0263) Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.45% Terrible	Lighting 0.53 Reflection 0.46 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.5 fps	MRender 0.43 Gravity 0.57 Splatting 0.7 0% 0.56 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.45% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN128HAHQ-000 128GB 41 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: MVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 161 160 162 162 162 MB/s Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	60.3% Good	Read 243 Write 230 Mixed 226 SusWrite 166 49% 216 MB/s	4K Read 26.6 4K Write 43.3 4K Mixed 32.2 104% 34 MB/s	DQ Read 178 DQ Write 168 DQ Mixed 174 130% 173 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 114%
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 320GB-$40 17,642 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 62GB free Firmware: ES2O SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 46 46 47 46 46 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	27.9% Poor	Read 51 Write 43 Mixed 30 SusWrite 46.2 31% 42.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	16.3% Very poor	MC Read 5.5 MC Write 4.4 MC Mixed 4.7 14% 4.87 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 4.8 14% 4.97 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16