Lenovo 80G0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80G0  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lancer 5A6
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140718
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateApr 05 '20 at 16:01
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium N3540
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
43.7% Average
Memory 70.4
1-Core 25
2-Core 50.3
35% 48.6 Pts
4-Core 101
8-Core 100
14% 101 Pts
64-Core 100
6% 100 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3905) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.92% Terrible
Lighting 0.97
Reflection 1.12
Parallax 1
1% 1.03 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.61
1% 1.44 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.92%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$48
266GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 220 219 224 222 218 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.1% Good
Read 251
Write 201
Mixed 187
SusWrite 220
48% 215 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 45.2
4K Mixed 26.3
95% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 180
138% 188 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 125%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 16GB-$8
10GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 6.6 6.2 6.6 4.2 3.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 35.9
Write 12.5
Mixed 21.4
SusWrite 6.5
22% 19.1 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.5
116% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 32%
Samsung M2 Portable 1TB
764GB free, PID 60b6
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 41 40 41 41 40 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Read 38.6
Write 28.8
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 39
45% 33.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C11 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.2% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 7.2
22% 7.63 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 5
12% 4.3 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80G0 Builds (Compare 730 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80G0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback