Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive140% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory22.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161202
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 21 '17 at 20:26
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 81.5
1-Core 96.7
2-Core 187
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 601
60% 490 Pts
64-Core 767
48% 767 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
Asus(1043 04FD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 16.12.2
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.6% Average
Lighting 56.4
Reflection 65.4
Parallax 72.9
46% 64.9 fps
MRender 66.4
Gravity 56.5
Splatting 54.3
48% 59 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX Predator AHCI PCIe M.2 480GB-$300
353GB free (System drive)
Firmware: OC34L5TP Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 1,179
Write 803
Mixed 941
216% 974 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 79.2
4K Mixed 18.3
107% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 19.6
84% 191 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 140%
Great: 181%
Intel(r) 910 200GB
242GB free
Firmware: a424
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Read 471
Write 487
Mixed 426
103% 461 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 49.1
4K Mixed 18.6
84% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 289
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 50.4
96% 193 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 84%
Intel(r) 910 200GB
242GB free
Firmware: a424
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
74% Very good
Read 470
Write 357
Mixed 425
93% 417 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 54.8
4K Mixed 17.9
82% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 50.9
80% 149 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 74%
Great: 84%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40
87GB free
Firmware: AX003M Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 74.2
Write 67.3
Mixed 76.6
55% 72.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.17
59% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 57%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
54GB free
Firmware: 2AR20004 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 88.5
Write 94.5
Mixed 103
72% 95.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.24
74% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT4G4DFS8213.C8FAD1 CT4G4DFS8213.C8FAD1 CT4G4DFS8213.C8FAD1 Micron 8ATF51264AZ-2G1A1 CT4G4DFS8213.C8FAD1 Micron 8ATF51264AZ-2G1A1 Micron 8ATF51264AZ-2G1A1 Micron 8ATF51264AZ-2G1A1 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
107% Outstanding
MC Read 42.2
MC Write 43.5
MC Mixed 41.2
121% 42.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 18.8
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 107%
This bench: 107%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE V EXTREME Builds (Compare 2,057 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME - $122

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $864
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback