Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 05 '20 at 01:07
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Memory 68.7
1-Core 143
2-Core 284
88% 165 Pts
4-Core 524
8-Core 883
86% 704 Pts
64-Core 1,298
80% 1,298 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.59
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 126
Parallax 125
105% 126 fps
MRender 161
Gravity 117
Splatting 96.2
99% 125 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 102%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
751GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 439 432 448 439 427 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 438
Mixed 435
SusWrite 435
102% 451 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 87.9
4K Mixed 51.8
170% 59.2 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 198
148% 199 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 109%
Great: 133%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
11GB free
Firmware: 0309
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 433
Write 193
Mixed 236
63% 287 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 44
4K Mixed 16.2
75% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 56.4
62% 103 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 72%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79
87GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 188 146 147 173 194 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 124
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 174
90% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2
364% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 110%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
361GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 132 132 133 133 131 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 151
Write 124
Mixed 76.3
SusWrite 130
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
211% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$114
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.7% Good
MC Read 26
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 26.5
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 22.4
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,799 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $937
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback