Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive546% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming  (all builds)
Memory2.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180705
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateApr 04 '20 at 22:57
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Memory 95.8
1-Core 129
2-Core 254
90% 160 Pts
4-Core 445
8-Core 823
76% 634 Pts
64-Core 1,041
64% 1,041 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 442.59
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.4% Above average
Lighting 64.7
Reflection 70.6
Parallax 60.4
53% 65.3 fps
MRender 68.1
Gravity 62.7
Splatting 68.8
55% 66.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB (2017)-$154
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B35900WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 50 50 49 48 52 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
546% Outstanding
Read 6,244
Write 57.5
Mixed 112
SusWrite 49.1
336% 1,616 MB/s
4K Read 725
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 7.1
1,109% 245 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 546%
Great: 155%
Ocz-vertex2 3.5 90GB
83GB free
Firmware: 1.37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 55 55 53 49 49 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 153
Write 62.7
Mixed 112
SusWrite 54.3
21% 95.4 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 69.9
4K Mixed 11.6
86% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 93.3
DQ Mixed 90.1
74% 106 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 49%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$74
773GB free
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1757 947 536 597 596 613 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
268% Outstanding
Read 2,002
Write 2,185
Mixed 1,712
SusWrite 841
378% 1,685 MB/s
4K Read 46.3
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 70.6
253% 96.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,439
DQ Write 1,216
DQ Mixed 1,276
970% 1,310 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 268%
Great: 347%
Seagate ST3500410AS 500GB
18GB free
Firmware: CC37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 91 90 90 90 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 90
Write 83.2
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 89.4
60% 80.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 72%
Kingston DataTraveler R 2GB
1GB free, PID 1604
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 8.1 7.6 8.1 8 8.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
6.76% Terrible
Read 16.5
Write 6.5
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 7.9
11% 9.15 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
42% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.76%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
86.2% Excellent
MC Read 34.8
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 24.7
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 32.2
SC Mixed 27.8
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 54.5
73% 54.5 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 3,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $844
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback