Asus MAXIMUS IX FORMULA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 04 '20 at 16:52
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$250
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Memory 97.2
1-Core 142
2-Core 276
96% 172 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 773
80% 643 Pts
64-Core 772
48% 772 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
EVGA(3842 6798) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 442.19
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 20
Reflection 23.1
Parallax 18.8
16% 20.6 fps
MRender 28.6
Gravity 20
Splatting 26.1
20% 24.9 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 9,748
Write 9,337
Mixed 9,384
2,121% 9,490 MB/s
4K Read 669
4K Write 347
4K Mixed 446
1,769% 487 MB/s
DQ Read 1,599
DQ Write 1,236
DQ Mixed 1,308
1,008% 1,381 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
196GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 490 318 313 312 313 313 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 471
Mixed 433
SusWrite 343
99% 439 MB/s
4K Read 46.5
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 64.3
224% 81.4 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 362
273% 365 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 127%
Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
664GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 489 489 490 491 491 491 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 448
Mixed 423
SusWrite 490
105% 467 MB/s
4K Read 50.5
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 71.2
239% 85.5 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 362
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 141%
Great: 133%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
463GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 111 111 112 111 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 88.5
Write 86.8
Mixed 85.9
SusWrite 111
69% 93 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 76%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174
2.5TB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 188 181 184 189 183 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 189
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 185
116% 160 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.7
199% 2 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 106%
Great: 113%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
4GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 4.2 3.9 3.8 4 3.8 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
9.51% Terrible
Read 35.8
Write 6.7
Mixed 9
SusWrite 4.2
14% 13.9 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 2.9
141% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.51%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 38.9
MC Write 38.8
MC Mixed 28.1
101% 35.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 38.1
SC Mixed 31.7
88% 30.8 GB/s
Latency 49.5
81% 49.5 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 100%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX FORMULA Builds (Compare 1,518 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX FORMULA - $378

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $1,236
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback