Performance Results


Gaming 102% UFO	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 94% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	86% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C02
Motherboard	MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) (all builds)
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191025
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 04 '20 at 12:38
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	HRV-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	88.2% Excellent	Memory 74.8 1-Core 147 2-Core 291 91% 171 Pts	4-Core 546 8-Core 802 84% 674 Pts	64-Core 1,032 64% 1,032 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 88.2% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 376B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 445.75 Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	116% Outstanding	Lighting 156 Reflection 169 Parallax 161 128% 162 fps	MRender 114 Gravity 158 Splatting 114 104% 129 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 115GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3G37R5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 148 107 103 95 103 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	86% Excellent	Read 487 Write 411 Mixed 340 SusWrite 142 77% 345 MB/s	4K Read 33.7 4K Write 82.8 4K Mixed 40.1 146% 52.2 MB/s	DQ Read 314 DQ Write 262 DQ Mixed 159 154% 245 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 86% Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80 112,118 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 810GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 136 142 130 141 137 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	59.7% Above average	Read 71 Write 88.5 Mixed 55.8 SusWrite 137 65% 88.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 114%
SanDisk Ultra 64GB 2,296 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 37GB free, PID 558a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 9.3 7.2 13 12 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	8.76% Terrible	Read 42 Write 3.5 Mixed 9.7 SusWrite 10.1 16% 16.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.3 16% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.76% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D32AESBK.M8FE1 2x8GB 13,393 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	71.1% Very good	MC Read 30.2 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 28.1 73% 25.4 GB/s	SC Read 21 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 27.2 63% 22 GB/s	Latency 90.8 44% 90.8 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 115%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 98%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 92%

Nuclear submarine

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,439x
RX 5700-XTAMD $199Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	1,291x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	1,114x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	650x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	530x
P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBCrucial $73Bench 212%, 171,271 samples	523x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	1,919x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	976x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	751x

Value: 110% - Outstanding

Total price: $548

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16