Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics87.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive32.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus EX-A320M-GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateApr 04 '20 at 08:03
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 71.1
1-Core 75.7
2-Core 173
60% 107 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 655
61% 506 Pts
64-Core 1243
77% 1243 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Nvidia(10DE 119D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
87.2% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 135
Parallax 127
87% 123 fps
MRender 96.2
Gravity 122
Splatting 102
87% 107 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE360000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 48 49 43 44 36 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.8% Below average
Read 262
Write 57.7
Mixed 6
SusWrite 44.4
20% 92.5 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 26.7
4K Mixed 11.5
55% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 31.2
DQ Mixed 34.4
35% 58.5 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 53%
WD Blue 3D 250GB-$31
62GB free
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 202 200 203 200 203 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Read 460
Write 267
Mixed 330
SusWrite 218
71% 319 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 70.5
4K Mixed 41.6
141% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 280
229% 326 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 105%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
130GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 106 106 106 107 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 145
Write 145
Mixed 104
SusWrite 106
93% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
224% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 109%
WD Purple Surveillance 4TB (2017)-$73
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 173 174 172 175 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 174
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 173
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
210% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 101%
Great: 113%
WD Purple Surveillance 4TB (2017)-$73
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 120 120 120 122 124 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 118
Write 114
Mixed 66
SusWrite 120
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
212% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK8GX4M1A2400C14 CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.1% Average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 12.2
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 15
42% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 98.9
40% 98.9 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EX-A320M-GAMING Builds (Compare 1,222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $241
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback